Saturday, June 27, 2015

David's Law Sanity 012815

LAWMAKERS IN ALBANY NEED DAVID’S LAW
by Ed Griffin-Nolan - Wednesday, January 28th, 2015
(This may or may not be an exclusive)
A lawyer friend of mine says that whenever a law is named for someone, you can pretty much figure that it’s a bad law.
I generally agree with my friend the attorney, but after the indictment of Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, I’m willing to make an exception this time and offer the following suggestion: The New York State Legislature, or at least the unindicted remnant of its members, should pass David’s law, named in honor of Oneida’s own Sen. David Valesky, a six-term Democrat who belongs to the Independent Democratic Conference, a tiny band of legislators who have hopes of being the swing votes in the state Senate and pushing a reform agenda.
Sen. Dave Valesky Michael Davis Photo | Syracuse New Times
Sen. Dave Valesky
Michael Davis Photo | Syracuse New Times
Valesky is unashamed to admit in public, and to verify in writing on his financial disclosure forms, that he moonlights as the accompanist playing the organ at the Catholic church where he grew up and where his family attends Mass most Sundays. The disclosure forms say he is paid less than $5,000 for this service, but the senator himself once told me the exact amount is $500. (This may or may not be an exclusive.)
In the wake of the allegations that Silver collected millions of dollars in bribes disguised as legal work, it seems evident to me that the time has come to finally force our legislators to do the job we hired them to do and to knock off this moonlighting.
Legislating and serving one’s constituents is a full-time job, and it should be treated as such. Gov. Andrew Cuomo, in his State of the State speech one day before the Silver bombshell, seemed to acknowledge as much. The governor suggested a pay cut for any legislator who moonlights.
In this space, you have been hearing for years a simpler and more radical proposal:  In exchange for the privilege of representing us (and the ample salary and perks we bestow upon them), our state legislators should be mandated to forego outside income.
Except that would deprive the good people of St. Patrick’s parish in Oneida of the valued services of Mr. Valesky. Not wishing to force a sanctuary filled with worshippers to sing a cappella, let us adopt the following compromise: No one in the Assembly or Senate is allowed to earn more outside income than Dave Valesky. If the parish gives him a raise, the whole Albany bunch can up their take by just as much.
In the meantime, let’s remind them: They work for us, and not the other way around.

Je Suis Abdullah?

President Barack Obama and Indian Prime Minister Narenda Modi watch a parade and award ceremony during India's Republic Day celebration in New Delhi on Jan. 26.
President Barack Obama and Indian Prime Minister Narenda Modi watch a parade and award ceremony during India’s Republic Day celebration in New Delhi on Jan. 26.
President Barack Obama, who skipped the Paris march of world leaders in support of freedom of expression after the Charlie Hebdo massacre by Islamic extremists, cut short his stay in India to pay his respects to the deceased king of Saudi Arabia, where blogger Raif Badawi has been publicly caned for publishing views challenging the Islamic extremists who run his country.
Obama’s obsequiousness to the Saudi kingdom (which, lest we forget, was home to 15 of the 19 men who attacked us on Sept. 11, 2011) is consistent with long-standing U.S. policy of ignoring the kingdom’s discrimination against women, lack of due process and its theocratic worldview while peddling armaments to the Saudis to the tune of nearly $86 billion over the past five years. That’s billion, with a “B.”

Gangster Oilmen

“Abdullah presided over one of the world’s most wicked nonpariah states, whose domestic policies are almost cartoonishly repressive and whose international influence has been strikingly malign. His dynasty is founded on gangsterish control over a precious natural resource, sustained by an unholy alliance with a most cruel interpretation of Islam and protected by the United States and its allies out of fear of worse alternatives if it fell.”
— Russ Douthat, columnist, New York Times
*

Micere Mugo Sanity 041515

MICERE MUGO’S TIRELESS PURSUIT
by Ed Griffin-Nolan - Wednesday, April 15th, 2015
Professor Mugo has served on the faculty of the African American studies Department at SU


Can you imagine a Syracuse without Micere Githae Mugo? Can you imagine if a giant walked in our midst, so quietly that we did not know it?
Micere Mugo’s many friends and colleagues gathered at Syracuse University on April 2 and 3 to paint a picture of a career and a life that has caused ripples to roll across generations and institutions and disciplines. She was honored as a playwright, literary critic, and a social and political activist who challenged colonial and neocolonial rule in Africa as bravely as she challenged racism here in Syracuse and around the United States. And she was saluted as a kind friend, an auntie and a tireless mother for the many younger women she brought under her wing.
For 22 years Mugo has served on the faculty of the African American Studies Department at SU. It is not enough to call her work interdisciplinary. In her writing and scholarship she shreds the lines between disciplines, nor is she bound by any line between academia and activism. She has been an adviser, a mentor, an activist, a role model, and, beginning as a young woman in East Africa, a pioneer in national liberation struggles and campaigner for human rights.
She has built a reputation based on hard work and relationships with students, colleagues and friends who were once strangers. When you meet her it is hard not to feel that you are in the presence of royalty, if royal status were not hereditary but instead earned by selfless service. “Can you imagine?” she would say.
Late last year word started to filter out from the SU Hill that Mugo would be retiring at the end of the spring semester, pushed by nagging health issues and pulled by a desire to spend more of her time in her native Kenya. Supporters across campus mobilized to prepare a proper tribute.
Then word spread to other campuses, here in the United States, then in Europe and the United Kingdom, and back home to Africa. By the time the event kicked off on April 2, 30 different university and community institutions and organizations were lined up to sponsor, dozens of academics competed for a chance to speak, artists and writers clamored to perform in her honor.
Micere Mugo
SU Chancellor Kent Syverud and Micere Mugo
Mugo’s celebration brought back former chancellor and good friend Nancy Cantor to the SU Hill for what may have been her first appearance since she left town a year ago. The tribute included music from the James Gordon Williams Trio (which includes bass player Bill Horrace, whose day job is chair of the Economics Department at SU), dance from several student and community groups, and readings from poets from Syracuse and around the world.
You would never think when listening to her gentle voice that the slight woman (as one participant put it, “rocking the African headdress”) had lived through exile, incarceration and threats in Kenya and abroad as a result of speaking against the dictatorship that ruled her country after independence. One play she wrote along with her Kenyan colleague Ngugi wa Thiong’o, entitled The Trial of Dedan Kimathi, a Mau Mau independence fighter, is considered a classic of political drama 40 years after it was first produced.
Mugo was lauded as a teacher and a mentor, a poet and a playwright, but also as an “auntie” to so many women, and a surrogate mom to many more. She was remembered as one who could gently prod her colleagues or her students to take risks and work harder.
The symposium in her honor was entitled “Tireless Pursuit” and the theme of Mugo’s seemingly boundless energy was raised again and again. She helped found the local organization United Women of Africa, the Ghana Society of Central New York, and the Pan African Community of Central New York.
Dean Diane Lyden Murphy said that Micere Mugo possesses “a moral compass for knowing the right thing to do and a talent for inspiring others to follow — gently.” Willy Munyoki Mutunga, who serves as the chief justice of Kenya’s Supreme Court, made the journey from Nairobi to Syracuse to discuss the topic, “Micere as the Mother of Feminist Masculinity.” He recounted a time in the 1970s when Mugo, then the mother of two small girls, was appointed the first female dean of a college at the University of Nairobi. In a meeting with her colleagues, he recalled, she began by mentioning that she had a question for her male counterparts: “Do you cook? Do you do your laundry? Do you change the nappies on your children?” She made her point.
Feature photo: Micere Mugo (left) with Linda Carty, professor in the African/African-American Studies Department  at Syracuse University. Alejandro Garcia photo.

Earth Day 2015 Sanity

CLIMATE CHANGES EARTH DAY PERSPECTIVE
by Ed Griffin-Nolan - Wednesday, April 22nd, 2015
What do we do to try to diminish our impact on global climate change?
Global warming should have a YouTube account. It should threaten beheadings, claim religious justification for its actions, and recruit a handful of our young ones to its cause. Then maybe we would start to fear it as much as we should.
Well, it worked for ISIS. The latest Middle Eastern terrorist boogey men, now in retreat across Iraq, certainly caught our attention. ISIS has managed to make us willing to expend all manner of national treasure, prestige and energy in the battle to exterminate them. Climate change that threatens our way of life? Not so much.
HomeUnderwaterWhile our behavior inexorably melts the glaciers, swamps our shorelines and multiplies the number of crazy weather events each year, it is the relatively remote but prominently publicized terrorist threat that has been the driving force for so many of our national policies. The terrorists have been able to harness the awesome power of fear, while the environmentalists cling tenaciously to a belief in the power of reason.
No contest.
If ISIS is Fox News, climate change is CNN. Or C-SPAN. Climate change moves too slowly, the science is too complicated, and there are too many parties too heavily invested in the status quo. It doesn’t help that the face most commonly associated with the cause is Al Gore, who seems too easy a target for mockery.
Even when climate change occasionally rears its head in a nasty way, as was the case with Hurricane Sandy, deniers were quick to dispute the links between our impact on the climate and its revenge upon us.
Think about it: There are no ISIS deniers, are there? In history’s rearview mirror, we will long have forgotten ISIS and Al Qaida, when we are trying to mop up from our failure to know which threats we should truly fear. But we hear no debate about whether ISIS is a threat.
What do we do to try to diminish our impact on global climate change? We shout up the stairs for the kids to turn out the lights, which is the modern equivalent of telling kids to clean their plates because children are starving in Africa. We recycle. We insulate.
One weekend a year we strap on rubber gloves and stalk the shoulders of our highways filling plastic bags with crap that passing drivers have carelessly thrown out their windows. Spring cleanups are great for building community, but they only remedy the actions of bad neighbors, not the mega damage we’ve done to our planet’s atmosphere.
Our newbie in Congress, John Katko, has made a high priority of fighting the terrorist threat. He is on a task force Congress created to keep us safe from the threat of homegrown fighters. All well and good. On his website, Katko has a list of 12 issues. Climate change is not one of them.
President Obama, in his 2015 State of the Union address, finally decided to level with us, calling climate change (not terrorism) “the greatest threat to future generations.” Note that Obama’s epiphany came after his party’s last electoral contest on his watch.
Climate change is a real threat. But we don’t get warned about it, don’t get asked to stay up all night and fret about it. No one gets frisked on their way out of Walmart to determine the carbon footprint of their purchases.
There’s no percentage in it for a politician, because the problem is us. No politician wants to face telling us the truth about our consumption and our propensity for waste. If you take an issue like a tax on carbon, even a revenue-neutral version that would distribute the proceeds to the people, there isn’t even a discussion.
The operative response from the vast majority of Republicans is to reject environmental concerns as job killers and denounce regulation as assaults on freedom. We need to remind them how tough it will be to find work and celebrate freedom when our coastline is submerged.

Say Yes Still a Good Idea - 050615

SAY YES: STILL A GOOD IDEA
by Ed Griffin-Nolan - Wednesday, May 6th, 2015
What we need now is a recommitment to Say Yes
(Read Part 1 – CLICK HERE)
If we could see before and after pictures of the streets of Baltimore that were the scene of (first and foremost) peaceful protests and then (when the cameras were rolling) violence and looting, the contrast would be easy to describe. A very poor neighborhood just got poorer.
It wasn’t just about the police and how they treated Freddie Gray. People much closer to the scene than you or me have observed that the anger that took over the streets of Baltimore has been percolating for a long time. The killing of Gray was the match that lit the fuse for days of street fighting and looting. Say what you want about the choices made by individuals, the social context is inescapable: The anger is fueled by poverty and lack of opportunity.
Maryland is the wealthiest state in the nation, and yet in her greatest city, Baltimore, more than a quarter of the people live in poverty. According to the Census Bureau, in 2013, Baltimore ranked 131st among U.S. cities in terms of the percentage of people living below the poverty line.
Syracuse? We were No. 23, and that was a big improvement over the previous year. Fully a third of Syracusans are poor.
In Baltimore, 68 percent of high school students graduate in four years. In Syracuse, our graduation rate is slowly improving, but still barely more than half graduate on time: 51.1 percent graduate in June, a figure that increases to 56.8 percent by August. Truth is, we aren’t doing as well as Baltimore in either education or dealing with poverty. So when people wonder if it can happen here, I think that the real question is: When will it happen here?
When poverty, crime and hopelessness collide, two groups of people are always at that intersection: teachers and the police. It’s easy to blame the police, and if the charges leveled by Baltimore prosecutor Marilyn Mosby hold up, they should be blamed for Freddie Gray’s death. But they can’t be blamed for an economy that leaves too many city people without hope, without opportunity.
Whenever the discussion turns to opportunity, we have to talk about education. Eliminating barriers to graduating from high school and helping more urban youth get to college and succeed: That’s a surefire way to help families, neighborhoods and cities climb out of poverty. What we like to do instead is to blame the teachers for failed schools and the cops for dangerous streets.
City of Syracuse Mayor Stephanie Miner, Onondaga County Executive Joanie Mahoney and then-Syracuse University Chancellor Nancy Cantor all endorsed Say Yes to Education because it offered scholarships as an incentive for our kids to finish school plus the social supports needed for those kids to make it.
We have allowed the simple promise of Say Yes to get swallowed in what starts to sound, in the face of such an enormous need, like petty bickering. Teachers have never been fully on board with Say Yes because they were not invited to help shape it and instead perceive it as an imposition from outside. Parents, administrators and outside experts have criticized the after-school programs for kids as uneven, poorly planned, and sometimes unproductive. And frankly, teachers battered by state mandates and violence in their own classrooms and hallways can’t be blamed for operating in survival mode.
But, as Say Yes national president Mary Anne Schmitt-Carey points out, Onondaga County has taken on a much larger role in providing health and social services to needy kids as a result of collaboration with the Syracuse school district. All of the Say Yes supports are now locally owned and driven, and Schmitt-Carey’s organization recommitted last week to backing the scholarships. We can’t let that promise fade.
One reason Say Yes inspired so much hope in 2008 was that it brought together the city, the school district, the county, the university, and private partners to work together on behalf of our kids. What we need now is a recommitment from all those partners. We’ve seen too many good ideas drown in our own pessimism. From the mayor, from the Central New York Community Foundation, from the superintendent on down, we need to hear an affirmation of Say Yes. The alternative is too harsh to bear.

Toby Shelley's Conservative Context 061015

TOBY SHELLEY’S CONSERVATIVE CONTEXT
by Ed Griffin-Nolan - Wednesday, June 10th, 2015
Toby Shelley will be running to hold office next fall against Joanie Mahoney.
Syracuse New Times editor-in-chief Larry Dietrich has one general rule about covering political contests. Larry’s Law goes like this: “Nobody pays attention to politics until Labor Day.”
He’s got a good point. We just emerged from a brutal winter. Downtown, people are sitting outdoors at sidewalk tables sipping a pint, jamming festivals and road races and, best of all, feasting on fresh local strawberries sent from Baldwinsville to drive those hard, tasteless California berries from the shelves.
We could be tempted not to care. If you listen to national media following the alleged presidential pursuits of Lincoln Chafee and George Pataki (yes, George Pataki) and more than a dozen others, the notion of a Larry’s Law prohibiting perpetual campaign reporting starts to sound better every day. Outdoors in the sunshine, it gets hard to remember just why we are supposed to care about who will hold office next fall.
Honoring the wisdom of Larry’s Law by making an exception, I wrote last week about the unusual alliances shaping up in this fall’s county executive race. Incumbent Republican Joanie Mahoney finds herself with plenty of support from traditional Democratic allies in the city, especially among African- American organizations, while the Dems struggle to find someone to oppose her. (She won her second term running unopposed in 2011.)
Then from the shores of Otisco Lake comes Toby Shelley, retired Onondaga County Sheriff’s Department sergeant, military veteran, part-time cop and farmer. Shelley, who lost his bid to be sheriff in 2014, says that he is running to give the people a choice. During his time in the military, which included a stint in Iraq, Shelley says he was fighting “for democracy, not autocracy” and it irks him when a politician gets a free pass on Election Day.
Shelley says he wasn’t looking to run. He was recruited for the post by his friends in the Conservative Party. He has the endorsement of the Democratic Committee and, if no primary foe emerges, he will be on both lines in the fall. Shelley believes the race is winnable. “The Conservatives recruited me. I think there should be enough votes on the Conservative line to win.”
Asked about that odd alliance, he asserts that Central New Yorkers are “mostly moderate people in the center. Conservatives and Democrats may be different, but if you agree with the Constitution and paying your bills, then we agree.”
Mahoney last week attacked the Democrats for supporting a candidate who would run on the Conservative line, noting that the Conservative platform, among other things, endorses profiling and stop-and-frisk as police tactics. Shelley says he hasn’t seen that in the Conservative platform. He should check the website, where support of profiling is right there next to support for hydrofracking and opposition to gun control.
When it comes to policing, Shelley said at first that you can’t profile people based on race. “You can’t stop someone just based on their appearance. There has to be a criminal activity afoot, and they have to meet the description of the suspect.” The former candidate for sheriff then volunteered that, based on his experience in law enforcement, context was important.
Speaking from his farm overlooking Otisco Lake, Shelley said that, “For example, out in Marcellus, a community that is mostly Caucasian, if you see someone who looks different, you might just stop and talk to them, ask how they’re doing.”
Hmmm … Ask how they’re doing? That’s what he said. How is that different from stopping someone based on his appearance? If a cop sees a black person in an area where mostly white people live (even when there is no criminal activity afoot), that should raise concern?
It seems perfectly reasonable to the Democratic candidate for county executive, a man who last year ran for sheriff. Seems to me that stopping someone on the basis of skin color is the textbook definition of racial profiling.
In Toby Shelley’s world, being out in the county while black is grounds for being stopped by a cop. Small wonder that the city’s African-American political leadership is lining up behind Mahoney.
Speaking of summer, this season Sanity Fair will appear in the Syracuse New Times every other week, alternating with Jeff Kramer. And no more campaign politics ‘till Labor Day. That’s a promise.

Mahoney Blurred Lines Sanity 060315

http://www.syracusenewtimes.com/blurred-lines/

BLURRED LINES
by Ed Griffin-Nolan - Wednesday, June 3rd, 2015
After Onondaga County Executive Joanie Mahoney received the endorsement of the Alliance Network, a city-based African-American advocacy group, she was grateful. But she also thought to herself, “They’re not asking enough.”
In his May 20 endorsement press conference, held at the Dunbar Center on South State Street, South Side power broker Walt Dixie — leader of the Alliance Network, which is affiliated with the Rev. Al Sharpton — mentioned two reasons his group likes Mahoney over Democrat/Conservative Toby Shelley. One had to do with improvements in how the jail is treating people, and another had to do with streamlining public assistance appointments.
“Really?” Mahoney recalls thinking. Is that the best we can do? Is that all they are asking? A county leader can earn the endorsement of a black activist group twice just because her administration treats their people better when they become prisoners or paupers?
It’s time, says Mahoney, to raise the bar of expectations. And Dixie, along with others in the community, seems to be buying her brand of hope and change.
Mahoney says that if she is given another four years at the helm of the county, she wants to take a crack at doing much more for the urban core. “I want to bring back the black middle class,” she told me the day after the Alliance Network gave her its blessing. Bold words and not what you might expect from a Republican leader, but Mahoney is no stranger to unusual alliances.
She’s tight with Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo and is barely on speaking terms with local Republican boss Tom Dadey. Rural and suburban Republicans in the County Legislature regularly challenge her initiatives. Frequently those points of contention, from Save the Rain to Say Yes to Education to the sales tax formula, come when she advocates for city issues at the county level.
Dixie calls her a maverick. Others see opportunism. Mahoney says it’s personal.
The reigning county executive explains that she is, at heart, a city kid. She grew up on the edge of Upper Onondaga Park. She and her husband, Mark Overdyk, graduated from Corcoran High School. When she attends reunions of her Class of 1983, or her husband’s Class of 1981, she’s struck by the number of their African-American classmates who have gone on to professional careers and fled Syracuse for Charlotte or Atlanta or other Southern cities.
They migrate in search of jobs, but also, when they get talking about it, to escape this city with its persistent and soul-numbing segregation. That segregation, she says, weighs on her even after she moved her family out to the ’burbs.
Can a white Republican leader of a county reverse the trend of black flight from our town? She’s laid out a difficult challenge and is using language that makes many people uncomfortable. She echoes the charge made by others in her party that the Democrats have taken African-American votes for granted. In Syracuse, she argues, African-Americans have helped elect Democrats to every major office and have very little to show for it. Dixie echoes the same sentiment.
Mahoney bristles when she points out that Democrats have chosen a candidate to oppose her, Toby Shelley, who is running on the Conservative line. The Conservative party platform includes an endorsement of such police tactics as Stop and Frisk and profiling. She anticipates that Shelley would say that he doesn’t agree with everything in the Conservative platform. He does, and more. Next week we’ll hear what Shelley has to say about his race to replace Mahoney.

Honest to Goodness Sanity 062415

http://www.syracusenewtimes.com/begging-questions/

BEGGING THE QUESTIONS
by Ed Griffin-Nolan - Wednesday, June 24th, 2015
What is the "correct" response to have when a homeless person comes begging?
We’ve all been there. Sitting at the red light that won’t change, watching the guy with the sign, trying to figure out what to do about the homeless man begging for a few coins. He’s a veteran, says the sign. He hasn’t eaten in days, says the sign. He’s out of work, out of luck, out of options.
If you’re like me, there’s a tug-of-war going on inside you, a debate about how to respond. You know that he’s in need, but you’re not sure just what his needs are, and you’re pretty sure that hand-lettered cardboard sign is expressing, at best, a partial truth.
You feel bad for him shivering in the winter or broiling in the summer, but you harbor a reasonable doubt about whether rolling down the window to hand over your lunch money is really going to help. You know that there’s a good chance that you might even make things worse. I don’t like this little dance of deceit.
In this town, like most other communities, there are places for homeless men to get a meal. There are places for them to sleep. Charitable donations to those worthy organizations are a much better way to help the man standing on the median.
But there he is, just a window pane between your air-conditioned world and his disheveled hair, and you feel a need to do something, even if it is just to say a prayer. And honestly, most of us on most busy days pray only that the light will soon turn to green.
I know kind people who make an extra sandwich before they go to bed at night, and look for the chance to hand it to a needy person the next day. I have a friend who will buy a Subway gift card to pass on to a down-and-out fellow he regularly encounters. Another friend makes a point of keeping track of one man who refuses to live indoors, just to let him know that someone cares. Each plan has its own rationale, and each giver is motivated by a desire to do a little bit of good.
In my repertoire I have two practiced responses. I give my deposit bottles to the guys with the shopping carts, and I offer yard work to anyone willing to work for a few bucks.
Unless you have a better answer, it’s hard to criticize anyone for acting on their desire to give. Maybe by opening our wallets we at least keep our own hearts from hardening.
On the flip side, if you talk to the police or the neighbors or merchants who see these guys every day, certain truths emerge. While every story is unique, most homeless men share two things in common: addiction and mental illness. Most have suffered trauma, often in wartime. They are not seeking money for food; they are seeking cash for heroin, spike or beer.
Since the agencies can meet their basic needs, what can I accomplish by handing over a donation? There is this circle of deception. You tell me you need food, I give you money, and then you go buy beer.
The one exception to this is an elderly man named Mike, a poet and an alcoholic with deep blue eyes and a magnificent beard, who will ask me straight up for money for beer. Mike’s honesty and his age can sometimes inspire me to reach into my pocket. I know I’m not doing Mike any good, but at least I feel like we’re keeping it real. There’s something genuine about the transaction.
Then I got a text from a friend with a problem. She had a party and there were seven six-packs of beer left over. She preferred to have them out of the house before the kids came home from college. I obligingly collected them, and the Honest-to-Goodness project was launched. Now I drive around with my friend’s beer bounty in the car. When I see one of the guys I know, I hand him a couple of bottles.
I have no illusions that this is doing anyone any good, but it brightens his day and seems to me to add a bit more honesty to the equation. Previously the guys would lie to me about needing money for food. I would lie to myself and give them the money. Then they would take my money to Rite Aid and get a couple of Natty Lights.
This way we just cut out the middle man, and the deception. Honest to goodness.
Ed Griffin-Nolan

Use Facebook to comment on this post

Friday, June 5, 2015

SAY MAYBE TO EDUCATION
by Ed Griffin-Nolan - Wednesday, April 29th, 2015
Sadly, our kids have gotten used to broken promises.
When you make a promise to a child, it’s got to be a sure thing.
“I promise you that later on, after I get the lawn cut, I’ll take you to get ice cream.”
As soon as you shut that lawn mower off, those big eyes will light up and that kid will be right by your side, waiting to get in the car. Whatever is on your mind, to her it is ice cream time, and that’s that.
There’s nothing sadder than the eyes of a kid who just found out that a promise has been broken. Most parents would rather die than face those eyes.
Sadly, our kids have gotten used to broken promises.
New York state has ignored its promise to give our city’s kids a quality education. Nearly a decade after a court ordered the state to increase school aid, Albany finds reasons every spring not to provide the constitutionally mandated “sound, basic education.”
Syracuse long ago gave up on the hope that we can pay for the schools that our students deserve. We can’t tax ourselves, we can’t borrow, there’s nothing in the rainy day fund. When we’re not blaming the teachers, we blame flight to the suburbs, an unequal education aid formula, and, more recently, federal testing mandates. But for the kids in failing schools, it’s all the same thing: a broken promise.
In 2008, a new promise was made. Everyone from then-Councilor-at-Large Stephanie Miner to then-Syracuse School Superintendent Dan Lowengard called the Say Yes promise of a guaranteed college education to all qualifying graduates of Syracuse city high schools a “game changer.” Say Yes offered kids a chance out of poverty by making higher education attainable for those who couldn’t afford it. It offered support to help students graduate with the grades to get into college.
Say Yes was always a lot more than the promise of free tuition. But its bedrock, and the reason we embraced it, was the tuition promise. If Say Yes had just come to town to tell us how to reform our schools, we would have told them to take a number and wait in line. Unique in this package was the promise to the kids: You do the work, we’ll find the money.
In the April 12 edition of The Post-Standard, Say Yes leaders admitted to reporter Dave Tobin that if Syracuse doesn’t pony up, the scholarship fund for students going to state schools (that’s most of them) might run dry in a few years. The national Say Yes, which ceased funding the student supports a year ago, threatened to quit backstopping the scholarships by 2017. We are expected to fund an endowment of $20 million or $30 million to keep it going. (So far there’s $10 million, raised over the course of eight years).
It sounded for a minute like the cynics who found the Say Yes promise too good to be true were right after all.
It sounded like those of us who saw this investment in our town as a game changer were the fools after all.
Did Say Yes, when it showed up in 2008, say that funding the scholarships would be our responsibility after a period of time?
I asked Pat Driscoll, who runs the Say Yes local operations, if there was any evidence — a press release, or a sound bite, perchance a Wikileaked memo, indicating that Say Yes had said publicly at the outset that the promise had an endpoint. So far, nothing has showed up.
Syracuse Mayor Stephanie Miner has chosen not to comment on this. Syracuse University Chancellor Nancy Cantor has moved on.
Ann Rooney, deputy county executive for human resources, and Kim Bradley, chief of staff of the school district, both expressed confidence that the money can be raised locally. But that wasn’t the question. The question was: Is this a hope or a promise?
Lowengard, who was present at the beginning, says that it was a promise from Say Yes National. “It was George Weiss’ money” that would back the promise, he says, referring to the hedge fund owner who founded Say Yes.
Just before we went to press, Mary Anne Schmitt-Carey, the president of Say Yes National called. She had many challenges for the people of Syracuse and our leaders. But this she made clear: Say Yes National and George Weiss will make sure the scholarships are in place.
Asked directly if she was guaranteeing that the national organization would backstop those scholarships past 2017, she did something that kept hope alive in a city that sometimes has a tough time believing in itself.
She said yes.
More on Say Yes and our conversation with Mary Anne Schmitt-Carey next week.
SAY YES: STILL A GOOD IDEA
by Ed Griffin-Nolan - Wednesday, May 6th, 2015
What we need now is a recommitment to Say Yes
(Read Part 1 – CLICK HERE)
If we could see before and after pictures of the streets of Baltimore that were the scene of (first and foremost) peaceful protests and then (when the cameras were rolling) violence and looting, the contrast would be easy to describe. A very poor neighborhood just got poorer.
It wasn’t just about the police and how they treated Freddie Gray. People much closer to the scene than you or me have observed that the anger that took over the streets of Baltimore has been percolating for a long time. The killing of Gray was the match that lit the fuse for days of street fighting and looting. Say what you want about the choices made by individuals, the social context is inescapable: The anger is fueled by poverty and lack of opportunity.
Maryland is the wealthiest state in the nation, and yet in her greatest city, Baltimore, more than a quarter of the people live in poverty. According to the Census Bureau, in 2013, Baltimore ranked 131st among U.S. cities in terms of the percentage of people living below the poverty line.
Syracuse? We were No. 23, and that was a big improvement over the previous year. Fully a third of Syracusans are poor.
In Baltimore, 68 percent of high school students graduate in four years. In Syracuse, our graduation rate is slowly improving, but still barely more than half graduate on time: 51.1 percent graduate in June, a figure that increases to 56.8 percent by August. Truth is, we aren’t doing as well as Baltimore in either education or dealing with poverty. So when people wonder if it can happen here, I think that the real question is: When will it happen here?
When poverty, crime and hopelessness collide, two groups of people are always at that intersection: teachers and the police. It’s easy to blame the police, and if the charges leveled by Baltimore prosecutor Marilyn Mosby hold up, they should be blamed for Freddie Gray’s death. But they can’t be blamed for an economy that leaves too many city people without hope, without opportunity.
Whenever the discussion turns to opportunity, we have to talk about education. Eliminating barriers to graduating from high school and helping more urban youth get to college and succeed: That’s a surefire way to help families, neighborhoods and cities climb out of poverty. What we like to do instead is to blame the teachers for failed schools and the cops for dangerous streets.
City of Syracuse Mayor Stephanie Miner, Onondaga County Executive Joanie Mahoney and then-Syracuse University Chancellor Nancy Cantor all endorsed Say Yes to Education because it offered scholarships as an incentive for our kids to finish school plus the social supports needed for those kids to make it.
We have allowed the simple promise of Say Yes to get swallowed in what starts to sound, in the face of such an enormous need, like petty bickering. Teachers have never been fully on board with Say Yes because they were not invited to help shape it and instead perceive it as an imposition from outside. Parents, administrators and outside experts have criticized the after-school programs for kids as uneven, poorly planned, and sometimes unproductive. And frankly, teachers battered by state mandates and violence in their own classrooms and hallways can’t be blamed for operating in survival mode.
But, as Say Yes national president Mary Anne Schmitt-Carey points out, Onondaga County has taken on a much larger role in providing health and social services to needy kids as a result of collaboration with the Syracuse school district. All of the Say Yes supports are now locally owned and driven, and Schmitt-Carey’s organization recommitted last week to backing the scholarships. We can’t let that promise fade.
One reason Say Yes inspired so much hope in 2008 was that it brought together the city, the school district, the county, the university, and private partners to work together on behalf of our kids. What we need now is a recommitment from all those partners. We’ve seen too many good ideas drown in our own pessimism. From the mayor, from the Central New York Community Foundation, from the superintendent on down, we need to hear an affirmation of Say Yes. The alternative is too harsh to bear.
MOONLIGHTING BECOMES THEM
by Ed Griffin-Nolan - Wednesday, May 13th, 2015
Lay off the side work.
If you would be willing to take a job that paid $79,500 a year, involved no heavy lifting and meant you could work indoors most days (except for the occasional groundbreaking ceremony), please raise your hand. I see a lot of hands going up, and I haven’t even told you about the juicy perks such as the per diem that covers food and lodging, or the extra pay you get for serving on a committee (comfy chairs provided).
A lot of hands go up because that $79,500, the base salary for a member of the New York State Senate, is considerably higher than what the average individual in Onondaga County earns. Per capita income in our corner of the state has been parked just south of $29,000 for the past five years, adding up to a median household income of about $54,000. No per diems for driving to work, no bonus if you serve on a committee or even if you happen to be the guy who brings the doughnuts to the work site.
Photo: timeshighereducation.co.uk
Photo: timeshighereducation.co.uk
I have long believed that if we paid our legislators what the average person in our community earns, those legislators would be more inclined to view their actions first and foremost in terms of how they affect us. And they would never have to worry about voting themselves a raise: Every time they did something that helped our bottom line, it would help theirs, too.
That proposal, you may be sure, will never become law, but it offers an interesting way to look at how we pay our lawmakers, and it reminds us of just how much better off than the rest of us most of them are.
Still, for most senators and Assembly members, that is not enough.
The vast majority of them feel the need to earn gobs more money doing outside work, all the while insisting that their legislative work is a full-time occupation. Our local state Senator John DeFrancisco (R-Syracuse) is among the heavy hitters of the upper chamber, pocketing tens of thousands last year for his labors as a lawyer and a landlord, while his colleague Dave Valesky (D-Oneida) earns the St. Francis Award for the humblest senator. Valesky takes in somewhere between $1,000 and $5,000 accompanying the choir (I kid you not) at church on Sundays.
Michael Davis Photo | Syracuse New Times
Dean Skelos and John DeFrancisco.
Michael Davis Photo | Syracuse New Times
For some senators, collecting a salary two or three times what most of us earn while being able to make unlimited sums doing side work is still not enough. They still feel the need to scrape in a few extra bucks under the table (allegedly). Dean Skelos, the Republican leader of the Senate, who hails from Long Island, recently got to do the now-familiar Albany perp walk. Like former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver before him, he defiantly proclaims his innocence of corruption charges. U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara begs to differ.
Silver and Skelos, like Joe Bruno and Tom Libous and so many Albany power brokers before them, ran afoul of the law when they mixed up their private dealmaking with their roles as public servants. And how could it be otherwise?
Sen. DeFrancisco’s disclosure forms show that he is “of counsel” to his own law firm. Skelos and Silver both earned six and seven figures a year serving “of counsel” to law firms in which they were partners. The feds, and the public, have a right to know what they were doing to earn that money. Bharara will attempt to convince a jury that such arrangements act as a cover for bribery.
Reached by phone the day after he lost the battle to succeed Skelos, DeFrancisco said that he would be opposed to a prohibition on side work. In fact he sees holding a second job as a way to promote better legislating. “If someone goes into public service and they rely on that exclusively, they make decisions just based on public opinion. They have to worry about keeping their position.” Arguing that he and others are “citizen lawmakers,” DeFrancisco says, “We don’t want to have politicians as a separate class. I can be more independent than someone who has to win re-election.”
DeFrancisco’s first public office, Syracuse City School Board, paid no salary at all. “I don’t even think about that stuff. As for raises, I didn’t worry about them.”
BLACK AND WHITE AND DEAD ALL OVER
by Ed Griffin-Nolan - Wednesday, May 20th, 2015
Have black people discovered the secret of eternal life?
People always complain that the media doesn’t report on good news. Always so negative, is the common complaint. So you want to hear the good news? Black people don’t die any more in Syracuse and Onondaga County. At least not very often. I learned this from reading the obituary pages of The Post- Standard, our local thrice-weekly publication.
I’ve always been an avid obituary reader. Each printed tribute to a neighbor gone to his or her eternal rest reads like a time capsule, a mini-history of one corner of our community, sketched out one life at a time. I learn tons about our history by reading the stories of those who have preceded us and left behind families, careers, motorcycles, pets, gardens and memories. Even the euphemisms we use to describe the passage from life to death are a literary genre unto themselves.
But lately when I open the obituary pages, it seems that the dead are much paler than the folks I meet on the street. Could I be imagining this, or have black people discovered the secret of eternal life?
Go ahead. Open the paper. You’ll see what I mean. This is a snapshot of your community that you can’t grasp nearly as accurately if you just look at it just online, where obits appear as a list. You can’t get the same feel for the disparity online as you do when you unfold the paper itself and see all those faces.
On the printed page, it is a mural, and the picture speaks loudly. While segregation is often referred to as a fact of life, it goes beyond that: In our town, it’s also a fact of death.
Where are the obituaries and photos of the black people? Back in January I started to keep track of the numbers. Since you can’t really accurately assess someone’s race or ethnicity from his or her name alone, I just counted those whose obits included a photo, and only if the photo and accompanying information made it certain whether or not the deceased was of African descent.
On March 15, I counted 39 obituaries. Exactly two of them honored black decedents. On March 22, of the 40 deceased portrayed, four were African-American. April 14’s paper contained 21 obituaries, April 28 had 26; none appeared to be of African-American origin. On April 16, one of the 46 faithful departed were black.
Five days, 172 obituaries with photos — and seven black faces appear. And that’s just a sampling. You can pick your own days and the overall picture won’t change much.
Nearly 30 percent of Syracusans identify as African-American, and nearly 12 percent of county residents count themselves as black.
Can it be that black folks have stopped dying? According to the county, African-Americans actually die in greater proportions than whites. In its 2014 report entitled “The Onondaga County Community Health Assessment and Improvement Plan 2014-2017,” the county pointed out that death rates for African-Americans exceed those of the general population.
“In Onondaga County, 59.1 percent of black males will die before age 65, compared to 25.1 percent for white males. For every white person who dies prematurely, there are 2.53 premature deaths of a black person.”
So where are all these black deaths being noted? It seems that you’re more likely to die if you’re black, but less likely to have it noted in the paper of record.
Why is that? The Post-Standard now lets you write your own obituary, but if it exceeds two column inches, it charges you to publish it. A good-sized obituary can run you in the neighborhood of $2,000. Photos are an additional charge of $30.
An obituary is no longer a task handled by a reporter: It is uploaded by a funeral director to a sales representative. In other words, it’s not a story, it’s an ad. And a costly one at that.
So if your people are not likely to read the paper, and you don’t have an extra 2K sitting around when you die, why spend the cash and post the notice? The racial divide that haunts American life, it would seem, also haunts us beyond the grave.
Full disclosure: We are by no means trying to claim the moral high ground when it comes to diversity. It’s hard to remember back to the last time that the Syracuse New Times had even a single non-white staff member.


REDEFINING PATRIOTISM FOR FED PHONE SNOOPERS
by Ed Griffin-Nolan - Wednesday, May 27th, 2015
It is long past time to let this monstrous invasion of our privacy die.
If you have the time to visit the Liberty Bell in Philadelphia, as more than a million people do every year, in the same exhibit with the famous bell you’ll find an enlarged copy of a Daguerrotype photo of a group of abolitionists, including Frederick Douglass. The early image captures Douglass while attending an anti-slavery convention in the year 1850.
Thousands convened in Cazenovia in August of that year to plot resistance to the Fugitive Slave Act, an evil act of Congress that compelled Northern whites to serve as bounty hunters on behalf of Southern slaveholders.
Douglass ranks with the giants among upstate freedom fighters. At the time the image was taken by Ezra Greenleaf, Douglass was reviled by many in the North and South. With the insight that history grants, we consider him a hero. His challenge to America’s settled notions have been resolved. But in his lifetime he was called a traitor, and worse.
If you attempt to call the museum in Philadelphia, the area code you dial is 215. That also happens to be the number of the section of the misnamed “Patriot Act” that has been used by both the Bush and Obama administrations to permit the National Security Agency to keep track of all our phone calls.
The NSA, you might recall, collects what it calls “metadata” about all of us. It can pull up the details on who you called, when you called them, for how long you spoke. You don’t have to be suspected of a crime, it doesn’t have to get a warrant. The phone companies just hand over the records. Same goes for your email records. The NSA kept this a big secret for a decade until Edward Snowden exposed it in 2013.
Section 215 is about to expire. Barring congressional action on Sunday, May 31, it will die this weekend. As it should. Wisconsin Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, who authored the Patriot Act just after Osama bin Laden’s terrorists took down the Twin Towers and attacked the Pentagon, says to anyone who will listen that he never intended his legislative language to be used to condone federal snooping into the private communications of law-abiding citizens.
Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, another Republican, clogged up the Senate’s deliberations on May 20 with an 11-hour oration, refusing to allow that body to vote on extending Section 215 even a single day. The Senate leadership was forced to convene a special session of Congress on a Sunday to try to keep the spy operation up and running. It intends to replace the Patriot Act with the Freedom Act, using stirring labels to deflect the criticism that this so richly deserves.
It is long past time to let this monstrous invasion of our privacy die. The government has ample recourse if it needs to examine phone records. The special courts set up to review national security wiretaps routinely approve them nearly every time Big Brother comes knocking. And the law has not had its intended effect. We have yet to hear of a single instance in which this dragnet has prevented a terrorist act.
The rejection of the government’s overreach is bipartisan here in Central New York. Both our former representative, Democrat Dan Maffei, when he was in office, and our current Republican representative, John Katko, have gone on record opposing Section 215.
And what of Edward Snowden? We might well be blissfully ignorant of this evil were it not for the soft-spoken geek who now lives in exile. Snowden’s act gave us the knowledge that we needed to preserve our freedom, knowledge that the Congress is hopefully now using to right this wrong. He has been persecuted and forced to flee his own country.
Last I saw him he was on HBO’s Last Week Tonight with John Oliver, and not looking very happy. He has given up the life he knew. You don’t have to like the man to recognize a simple fact: He sacrificed his life to help preserve our freedom.
During the Vietnam War, draft resisters were attacked and persecuted, and only later, when President Jimmy Carter welcomed home those who fled to Canada, did we acknowledge the role they played in waking up the nation to the danger and folly of that war. And we welcomed them home.
Now it’s time to bring Snowden home. That means first offering him a pardon, for he currently faces federal espionage charges. Instead of persecution, what Snowden deserves is our gratitude for revealing violations of our nation’s ideals. Pardon Snowden, let him come home.
It is, after all, the season of celebrating patriots.

Tuesday, April 14, 2015

John Katko April 8, 2015

KATKO ON ISIS, WIRETAPS AND RAILCARS
by Ed Griffin-Nolan - Wednesday, April 8th, 2015
Katko has just completed his first quarter representing New York’s 24th Congressional District
On that first sunny day of spring, April 2, Rep. John Katko had just completed his first quarter representing Syracuse and the surrounding areas in New York’s 24th Congressional District when I asked him about several issues that should be familiar to Syracuse New Times readers.

ISIS and Shades of Gray

Katko has been appointed to the Bipartisan Task Force on Combating Terrorist and Foreign Fighter Threat. Given that role, I asked him if he believed that President Obama had authority to conduct air strikes, and to provide advisers and arms to forces fighting ISIS.
I think if it rises to the level of an armed conflict, the War Powers Act mandates that the president work with Congress on it,” Katko said. “Even if it technically doesn’t require congressional action, it’s probably a good idea from a consensus standpoint that he work with Congress.”
Obama has reached out to Congress,” said Katko, which he says is “always advisable. From a legal standpoint, under the War Powers Act that’s kind of a gray area.
To station troops on the ground, he said without hesitation, would require further legislative action.

Patriot Act and Government Snooping

Katko sits on the House Committee on Homeland Security. From that seat he’ll have to review sections of the post-9/11 national security law known as the Patriot Act. Section 215 of that law has been cited by both the Bush and Obama administrations to justify their collection of data on U.S. citizen’s phone calls and emails. It expires in June. Will Katko vote to renew that provision?
Not in its current form,” Katko answered. “I don’t agree with it. I’m concerned from a privacy standpoint. I’ve been doing wiretaps for 20 years (as a federal prosecutor). We got a court order for everything we needed and we had to prove to a judge why we needed it. I don’t think you can just throw out that standard. Of course we have to balance the privacy issues with the national security issues, and I’m not sure the first round of the Patriot Act did that well enough.” Katko said he hasn’t seen proposed language yet, but would like to see “substantial safeguards on how they use the information.
John Katko
John Katko’s nephew, Michael “Tots” Heagerty, leads the cheers on election night. The congressman is in the foreground.

Trains That Go Boom

Katko has sat in on a few hearings about rail shipments of Bakken crude, the volatile oil that chugs through Central New York every day on the railroad tracks.
This is very serious,” he said. “These trains come right through the heart of Syracuse. It’s frightening to think how much crude comes through the middle of this city every day. Highly volatile crude oil. Highly flammable. One hundred car trains going through every day – that’s a real concern.
Katko worries that these trains could prove a target for terrorists. “Law enforcement,” he said, “should be dealing with a terrorist-type incident with respect to the trains and practicing how to respond.
Then he had this to say about President Obama and environmentalists opposing the Keystone pipeline.
Why are these trains coming through here? If there is a pipeline, a lot of these trains wouldn’t be coming through here. I don’t know if there were ever plans for this to hook up with Keystone, but a pipeline is safer. That’s a fact.”
I’ve sat in on a hearing where members from the rail industry were asking Congress for more regulation. I repeat, they wanted more regulation to come out regarding specifications for upgrades of rail cars that are transporting this volatile crude. They’ve been asking for it for years, and this administration, for whatever reason, has just dragged its feet. That to me is the height of irresponsibility by the Obama administration. They (the rail companies) are asking for some clarity, and then they’re going to invest.
He agreed that any such changes will take years. So what would he say to parents who send their children to trackside schools or senior citizens whose windows look out on the train yards?
Local law enforcement and first responders need to prepare and conduct drills,” he said. Katko added that he has tasked his district office director, Tom Connellan, with “reaching out to local law enforcement to see if there is anything that we can do.



Ed Griffin-Nolan is a journalist who believes we have to ask the hard questions no matter whose interests are at stake. Sanity Fair is his weekly take on life, politics and society.