Friday, September 30, 2016

Happy Botswana Independence Day, Everyone

Happy Botswana Independence Day, Everyone!


Across the Atlantic Ocean, in a dusty village south of the Tropic of Capricorn, a few hours from the border with South Africa, our daughter Dia has been up all night with her neighbors singing and praying and cooking, as apparently most of Botswana’s two million people are doing, to celebrate fifty years of independence.
Botswana isn’t a place you hear of much in the news. It’s a big country, about the size of Texas. It’s very sparsely populated, and a lot of it is given over to the forbidding Kalahari desert. It’s got the largest inland delta in the world (two years ago I didn’t even know there were such things), and the most numerous elephant herd of any country in the world.
On the subject of elephants - Paul Allen, who founded Microsoft along with Bill Gates, recently paid for a crew of scientists to fly small planes all over Africa and count elephants, and his Great Elephant Census reports that there are about 130,000 elephants in Botswana.
I don’t have Paul Allen’s money, but we did go to Botswana earlier this year, and one afternoon I stopped our pickup truck on a dusty sand track near the Chobe River because an elephant had just emerged from the bush right in front of us. I shut off the engine (the only prudent response when a six-ton mammal lumbers anywhere in your general direction). Then I began to count.
Seventy four.
Seventy four elephants paraded in front of us on their way to the river that morning. That is a lot of elephants. In Botswana the elephant herd is growing – and that’s not the only thing. The preservation of wildlife has made the country a magnet for tourists around the world, a boom that employs one in every 20 working age Batswana (that’s what you call a citizen of Botswana).
Driving around Botswana (the highways are modern even by US standards) you see a country undergoing rapid growth. Stopping for breakfast in a chain restaurant in Francistown, the first thing the waitress asked me was if I wanted the wi-fi code. (Sure, I said, but mostly I needed coffee – the Bats do not share my addiction to caffeine). As we drove from Dia’s village back to the capital of Gabarone, (a city without stoplights as recently as 1989) a colleague of hers told us that the four-hour trip, again along a splendid highway, would have taken 10 or 12 hours just a few years back.
Botswana has some advantages that other post-colonial African nations do not. Landlocked and sparsely populated, it was not considered a prize by predatory European colonists, who preferred to pounce on South African and Namibian mines and coastland. Botswana asked to become a British protectorate in the early 20th century, and then dissolved the pseudo-colonial relationship with a handshake fifty years ago.
A year later they discovered the diamonds. It was like finding a winning lottery ticket in your pockets as you sort laundry.
The first President, Seretse Khama (whose two sons now serve as President and Minister of Tourism) had been disowned by his own tribe when he married a white British woman. Khama’s interracial marriage also greatly irritated apartheid South Africa. As a result, Khama set out to develop a national, not tribal, political base, and a multi-racial democracy. He let foreign companies bid on mining rights to the diamonds under terms favorable to Botswana, and invested the funds in public health, education and infrastructure. This served the country well and by the mid 1970’s Botswana was doing well enough to ask the Peace Corps to cease and desist in its development efforts.
Then came HIV. As many as one in four adults in Botswana were infected in the early years of the epidemic. Life expectancy dropped from first world levels (65 years on average) to below 40 years. In 1995, a 15-year-old in Botswana had a 50% chance of dying from an AIDS related illness.
Botswana responded to the epidemic slowly at first, but in time adopted educational, treatment, and preventive measures that are considered models for other countries.
Since 2002 it has been policy for the government to make anti-retroviral medications available free of charge, and nearly 70% of those infected are receiving the life-saving drugs. And Dia’s work with the Peace Corps is a part of that effort, one that makes her mother and I smile with pride.
So tonight, if you hear dancing and singing late into the night in a tongue that only the most devoted non-natives can master (we hear that Dia has gotten very good at it!), raise a glass to Bots 50, a proud moment for a small country that is trying, against some pretty heavy odds, to do right by its people.





Friday, June 17, 2016

Obama "Directly Responsible" for Orlando Murders, says McCain

This used to the be image of the two wings of the Republican Party. Independent minded war hero John McCain of Arizona, and, to his right, Alaska governor Sarah Palin. McCain chose Palin to run with him in 2008 against Barack Obama in hopes of winning the votes of Republicans who felt he was too liberal, or too much of a "maverick" to earn their support.

I resist the urge to say that Palin was selected to win over more "conservative" voters, because I do not wish to dishonor legitimate conservatives. Palin was, and remains, a part of the growing sector of Republicans who portray themselves as conservatives but are in fact either lazy politicians allergic to facts or opportunists who build their careers on encouraging ignorance. That Palin lives and dies by this is no surprise - her inability or unwillingness to think things through even got her fired from Fox News, no small feat. Some call it "shooting from the hip", which Donald Trump has elevated to an art form. President Obama called it "making stuff up", which I second, substituting a shorter and stinkier S word.

The news is that Palin's former running mate, the senior Senator from Arizona, a man whose name is half the moniker for our one standing piece of campaign finance reform (McCain-Feingold), has joined the fringe. As if Donald Trump's victory in the Republican primary process was not enough to convince us, John McCain's surrender to the fantasy land created by Fox News and nurtured by folks like Palin confirms - the moderate wing of the Republican party is dead.

McCain yesterday called President Obama "directly responsible" for the massacre in Orlando. Then a few hours later he mentioned that he "misspoke". Misspoke? Misspeaking is when you get the capital of Ohio wrong, it's when you confuse the budget deficit with the national debt, it might even be when you say, as Donald Trump did, that the murderer who shot up the Pulse nightclub was born in "Afghan", wherever that is.

When you call the sitting President an accomplice to mass murder at the very moment he is consoling the survivors, that is no misstatement. It is a clear statement of McCain's beliefs. And his core belief is this - that without the support of the crazy people in his party, he cannot win his sixth term in the Senate. Eight years ago a similar calculus pushed him to pick Palin, but we had the good sense to kick her to the curb. Whatever once passed for decency and common sense even among principled conservatives is no longer viable in the age of Trump.

Don't be confused by McCain's subsequent apology for his misstatement. All he needs is that tape of himself blaming Obama to serve up as red meat to the lunatic fringe, while the mainstream media allows him to "walk back" his story.

And all the rest of us are left to do is to watch as the party of Lincoln and Rockefeller, Jacob Javits and Dwight Eisenhower, tumble into incoherent rambling divorced from the truth and the serious business of running a country.

Wednesday, June 8, 2016

Bernie Fans, Is this just a campaign, or is it a movement?


What happens next will tell us if Sanders supporters are in this for the long haul, or just along for the ride.


I voted for Bernie Sanders.  He stands for most of the things I’ve stood for my whole life. A foreign policy that respects other countries. Domestic policies that put the poor and working class first. Addressing climate change with the urgency that this aching planet demands. He is demonstrably the candidate who understands these issues best and has the commitment to address them. Whether that means he would make the best President is an open question, but I voted for him on the issues.
Now that his fight for the nomination has failed, his supporters have a choice to make. We can howl that the process is rigged (pointless), we can vilify Clinton as a Wall Street lackey (yawn), or we can act as if we actually believe the words and the example of Bernie Sanders.
I’m not talking only about the Bernie Sanders who enchants with his straight talk, who pals around with Pope Francis, who charms tiny sparrows. I’m talking about the Bernie Sanders who has spent a lifetime as part of a movement for social justice, a pursuit that has always been secondary to his personal political aspirations.
The choice for Sanders’ supporters will be whether we can transform the organization and the energy of the campaign into a lasting movement. It will be about whether the Sanders’ followers, often criticized for being too young and too idealistic, can show the Democratic establishment and the rest of the country, that we are serious about radical change. We have to decide if we are in this to feel good, or to do good. (We also have to make sure that those in our ranks understand that we will be paying for the changes we hope to bring about – no small task).
Real change, as Sanders points out relentlessly, can only begin when we remove money from its central role in our politics. Sanders’ campaign, funded by folks with twenty-seven dollars to spare, nearly propelled him to the nomination. Now we must unite behind the Clinton candidacy from now until November, and, come January, be prepared to push her to uphold the campaign promises that Sander’s movement has forced her to make.

We will have to hold President Clinton’s feet to the fire on campaign finance reform. Every change that progressives hope to see is dependent on serious campaign finance reform, an end to what Sanders rightly calls a corrupt system and which many of us see as legalized bribery. No one has articulated this issue more clearly than Sanders. It is the key to returning power to the people and not just the people who can afford it. Overturn Citizens United. Banish the notion that corporations are people. Provide public financing for campaigns, and let ideas, not fund raising power, lead our public discourse.
It’s not an idea that we can let die just because more Democratic primary voters chose Hillary Clinton, with her ties to big money, as their candidate for President. It is far too important.
But how can a defeated Sanders hold sway over his one-time opponent’s policies? As Vice President, as some of his supporters suggest? Worst idea ever. Why lock Sanders away in the White House when he could be in the Senate and out in the country campaigning for change? Sanders has laid the groundwork for a movement that combines support for progressive causes, and support for progressive candidates with a fundraising power that can rival a Super Pac. Imagine a movement sweeping into key Congressional districts and swing states to turn out voters and flip some key Congressional seats this fall. Imagine what that movement could do in 2018 with a similar strategy.

Can Sanders’ supporters make this adjustment? Presidential candidates have tried to convert their campaigns into movements before. Jesse Jackson’s Rainbow Coalition comes to mind; President Obama’s Organizing for America group was somehow supposed to keep the grassroots involved even as their man sat in the Oval Office. Usually they end up as top down entities serving their leadership, and they peter out or lose relevance.
This time it could be different, because of the type of campaign he ran.
Many of the Sander’s troops seem to so enjoy vilifying Clinton that it makes unity seem unlikely. But a united Democratic Party this fall could open the door to progressive changes no one was even talking about before the Sanders surge. All because of the campaign he ran. A mature movement would recognize its victory even while conceding the failure of their Presidential campaign.
Clinton devotees must recognize that they will not win over the Sanders’ voters by simply noting that she is the lesser of two evils. We have heard that lullaby too many times. They must fully recognize that Bernie’s brigade not only rejects the triangulation politics that made the Clintons so successful in the 90’s, but that they are speaking to the concerns of a new generation.

A friend of mine who loves Bernie posed a common complaint – he just doesn’t trust Clinton. That is an excellent first step. Our political system is not based on trust. If we think our job is to vote once every four years and then let the elected run the country, we have misunderstood what it is to be a citizen of a democracy. We should not trust any politician to do anything other than what we have to power to make them do. Barack Obama in meeting with a group of environmentalists early in his first term was reported to have quoted FDR to them. “I agree with you. Now make me do it.”

If Hillary Clinton is our next President, Bernie Sander’s aroused following don’t have to like her or trust her. As Sanders has made clear, his political revolution is not solely about deciding who sits in the Oval Office. It really is about mobilizing the millions who have rallied to his cause, and then continuing to organize pressure that will keep a progressive agenda on track.






Wednesday, April 20, 2016

Decision Time for Those Who Are Feeling the Bern

Is this a movement, or a campaign?
What happens on Wednesday will tell us if Sanders supporters are in this for the long haul, or just along for the ride.


I’m voting for Bernie.  He stands for most of the things I’ve stood for my whole life. A foreign policy that respects other countries. Domestic policies that put the poor and working class first. Addressing climate change with the urgency that this aching planet demands. He is demonstrably the candidate who understands these issues best and has the commitment to address them. Whether that means he would make the best President is an open question, but I’m voting for him on the issues.
If Bernie doesn’t win  (and there is, no one can argue, at least a 50/50 chance that he won’t), his supporters have a choice to make. We can howl that the process is rigged (pointless), we can vilify Clinton as a Wall Street lackey (yawn), or we can act as if we actually believe the words and the example of Bernie Sanders.
I’m not talking only about the Bernie Sanders who enchants with his straight talk, who pals around with Pope Francis, who charms tiny sparrows. I’m talking about the Bernie Sanders who has spent a lifetime as part of a movement for social justice, a pursuit that has always been secondary to his personal political aspirations.
The choice for Sanders’ supporters will be whether they can transform the organization and the energy of the campaign into a lasting movement. It will be about whether the Sanders’ followers, often criticized for being too young and too idealistic, can show the Democratic establishment and the rest of the country, that we are serious about radical change. We have to decide if we are in this to feel good, or to do good. We also have to make sure that those in our ranks understand that we will be paying for the changes we hope to bring about – no small task.
Real change, as Sanders points out relentlessly, can only begin when we remove money from its central role in our politics. Sanders’ campaign, funded by folks with twenty-seven dollars to spare, just might propel him to the White House. If it does not, it must unite behind the Clinton candidacy from now until November, and come January be prepared to push her to uphold the campaign promises that Bernie has forced her to make.

That has to begin with vigorous support for grassroots efforts to promote public financing for campaigns. No one has articulated this more clearly than Sanders. It is the key to returning power to the people and not just the people who can afford it. Overturn Citizens United. Banish the notion that corporations are people. Provide public financing for campaigns, and let ideas, not fund raising power, lead our public discourse.
This should be the first course of action for a Sanders’ Presidency, or the first challenge that the Sanders’ movement lays at the feet of a President Clinton. Sanders has laid the groundwork for a movement that combines support for progressive causes, and support for progressive candidates with a fundraising power that can rival a Super Pac. Imagine a movement sweeping into key Congressional districts and swing states to turn out voters and flip some key Congressional seats this fall. Imagine what that movement could do in 2018 with a similar strategy. Let’s call it a People’s PAC.
Can Sanders’ supporters make this adjustment? Presidential candidates have tried to convert their campaigns into movements before. Jesse Jackson’s Rainbow Coalition comes to mind; President Obama’s Organizing for America group was somehow supposed to keep the grassroots involved even as their man sat in the Oval Office. Usually they end up as top down entities serving their leadership, and they peter out or lose relevance.
Many of the Sander’s troops seem to so enjoy vilifying Clinton that it makes unity seem unlikely. But a united Democratic Party this fall could open the door to progressive changes no one was was even talking about before the Sanders surge. A mature movement would recognize its victory even while conceding the failure of their Presidential campaign.
Clinton devotees must recognize that they will not win over the Sanders’ voters by simply noting that she is the lesser of two (or more) evils. We have heard that lullaby too many times. They must fully recognize that Bernie’s brigade not only rejects the triangulation politics that made the Clintons so successful in the 90’s, but that they are speaking to the concerns of a new generation.

A friend of mine who loves Bernie posed a common complaint – he just doesn’t trust Clinton. I thought that was a good first step. We should not trust any politician to do anything other than what we have to power to make them do. Barack Obama in meeting with a group of environmentalists early in his first term was reported to have quoted FDR to them. “I agree with you. Now make me do it.”

If Hillary Clinton is our next President, Bernie Sander’s aroused following don’t have to like her or trust her. As Sanders has made clear, his political revolution is not solely about deciding who sits in the Oval Office. It really is about mobilizing the millions who have rallied to his cause, and then continuing to organize pressure that will keep a progressive agenda on track.




Saturday, June 27, 2015

David's Law Sanity 012815

LAWMAKERS IN ALBANY NEED DAVID’S LAW
by Ed Griffin-Nolan - Wednesday, January 28th, 2015
(This may or may not be an exclusive)
A lawyer friend of mine says that whenever a law is named for someone, you can pretty much figure that it’s a bad law.
I generally agree with my friend the attorney, but after the indictment of Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, I’m willing to make an exception this time and offer the following suggestion: The New York State Legislature, or at least the unindicted remnant of its members, should pass David’s law, named in honor of Oneida’s own Sen. David Valesky, a six-term Democrat who belongs to the Independent Democratic Conference, a tiny band of legislators who have hopes of being the swing votes in the state Senate and pushing a reform agenda.
Sen. Dave Valesky Michael Davis Photo | Syracuse New Times
Sen. Dave Valesky
Michael Davis Photo | Syracuse New Times
Valesky is unashamed to admit in public, and to verify in writing on his financial disclosure forms, that he moonlights as the accompanist playing the organ at the Catholic church where he grew up and where his family attends Mass most Sundays. The disclosure forms say he is paid less than $5,000 for this service, but the senator himself once told me the exact amount is $500. (This may or may not be an exclusive.)
In the wake of the allegations that Silver collected millions of dollars in bribes disguised as legal work, it seems evident to me that the time has come to finally force our legislators to do the job we hired them to do and to knock off this moonlighting.
Legislating and serving one’s constituents is a full-time job, and it should be treated as such. Gov. Andrew Cuomo, in his State of the State speech one day before the Silver bombshell, seemed to acknowledge as much. The governor suggested a pay cut for any legislator who moonlights.
In this space, you have been hearing for years a simpler and more radical proposal:  In exchange for the privilege of representing us (and the ample salary and perks we bestow upon them), our state legislators should be mandated to forego outside income.
Except that would deprive the good people of St. Patrick’s parish in Oneida of the valued services of Mr. Valesky. Not wishing to force a sanctuary filled with worshippers to sing a cappella, let us adopt the following compromise: No one in the Assembly or Senate is allowed to earn more outside income than Dave Valesky. If the parish gives him a raise, the whole Albany bunch can up their take by just as much.
In the meantime, let’s remind them: They work for us, and not the other way around.

Je Suis Abdullah?

President Barack Obama and Indian Prime Minister Narenda Modi watch a parade and award ceremony during India's Republic Day celebration in New Delhi on Jan. 26.
President Barack Obama and Indian Prime Minister Narenda Modi watch a parade and award ceremony during India’s Republic Day celebration in New Delhi on Jan. 26.
President Barack Obama, who skipped the Paris march of world leaders in support of freedom of expression after the Charlie Hebdo massacre by Islamic extremists, cut short his stay in India to pay his respects to the deceased king of Saudi Arabia, where blogger Raif Badawi has been publicly caned for publishing views challenging the Islamic extremists who run his country.
Obama’s obsequiousness to the Saudi kingdom (which, lest we forget, was home to 15 of the 19 men who attacked us on Sept. 11, 2011) is consistent with long-standing U.S. policy of ignoring the kingdom’s discrimination against women, lack of due process and its theocratic worldview while peddling armaments to the Saudis to the tune of nearly $86 billion over the past five years. That’s billion, with a “B.”

Gangster Oilmen

“Abdullah presided over one of the world’s most wicked nonpariah states, whose domestic policies are almost cartoonishly repressive and whose international influence has been strikingly malign. His dynasty is founded on gangsterish control over a precious natural resource, sustained by an unholy alliance with a most cruel interpretation of Islam and protected by the United States and its allies out of fear of worse alternatives if it fell.”
— Russ Douthat, columnist, New York Times
*

Micere Mugo Sanity 041515

MICERE MUGO’S TIRELESS PURSUIT
by Ed Griffin-Nolan - Wednesday, April 15th, 2015
Professor Mugo has served on the faculty of the African American studies Department at SU


Can you imagine a Syracuse without Micere Githae Mugo? Can you imagine if a giant walked in our midst, so quietly that we did not know it?
Micere Mugo’s many friends and colleagues gathered at Syracuse University on April 2 and 3 to paint a picture of a career and a life that has caused ripples to roll across generations and institutions and disciplines. She was honored as a playwright, literary critic, and a social and political activist who challenged colonial and neocolonial rule in Africa as bravely as she challenged racism here in Syracuse and around the United States. And she was saluted as a kind friend, an auntie and a tireless mother for the many younger women she brought under her wing.
For 22 years Mugo has served on the faculty of the African American Studies Department at SU. It is not enough to call her work interdisciplinary. In her writing and scholarship she shreds the lines between disciplines, nor is she bound by any line between academia and activism. She has been an adviser, a mentor, an activist, a role model, and, beginning as a young woman in East Africa, a pioneer in national liberation struggles and campaigner for human rights.
She has built a reputation based on hard work and relationships with students, colleagues and friends who were once strangers. When you meet her it is hard not to feel that you are in the presence of royalty, if royal status were not hereditary but instead earned by selfless service. “Can you imagine?” she would say.
Late last year word started to filter out from the SU Hill that Mugo would be retiring at the end of the spring semester, pushed by nagging health issues and pulled by a desire to spend more of her time in her native Kenya. Supporters across campus mobilized to prepare a proper tribute.
Then word spread to other campuses, here in the United States, then in Europe and the United Kingdom, and back home to Africa. By the time the event kicked off on April 2, 30 different university and community institutions and organizations were lined up to sponsor, dozens of academics competed for a chance to speak, artists and writers clamored to perform in her honor.
Micere Mugo
SU Chancellor Kent Syverud and Micere Mugo
Mugo’s celebration brought back former chancellor and good friend Nancy Cantor to the SU Hill for what may have been her first appearance since she left town a year ago. The tribute included music from the James Gordon Williams Trio (which includes bass player Bill Horrace, whose day job is chair of the Economics Department at SU), dance from several student and community groups, and readings from poets from Syracuse and around the world.
You would never think when listening to her gentle voice that the slight woman (as one participant put it, “rocking the African headdress”) had lived through exile, incarceration and threats in Kenya and abroad as a result of speaking against the dictatorship that ruled her country after independence. One play she wrote along with her Kenyan colleague Ngugi wa Thiong’o, entitled The Trial of Dedan Kimathi, a Mau Mau independence fighter, is considered a classic of political drama 40 years after it was first produced.
Mugo was lauded as a teacher and a mentor, a poet and a playwright, but also as an “auntie” to so many women, and a surrogate mom to many more. She was remembered as one who could gently prod her colleagues or her students to take risks and work harder.
The symposium in her honor was entitled “Tireless Pursuit” and the theme of Mugo’s seemingly boundless energy was raised again and again. She helped found the local organization United Women of Africa, the Ghana Society of Central New York, and the Pan African Community of Central New York.
Dean Diane Lyden Murphy said that Micere Mugo possesses “a moral compass for knowing the right thing to do and a talent for inspiring others to follow — gently.” Willy Munyoki Mutunga, who serves as the chief justice of Kenya’s Supreme Court, made the journey from Nairobi to Syracuse to discuss the topic, “Micere as the Mother of Feminist Masculinity.” He recounted a time in the 1970s when Mugo, then the mother of two small girls, was appointed the first female dean of a college at the University of Nairobi. In a meeting with her colleagues, he recalled, she began by mentioning that she had a question for her male counterparts: “Do you cook? Do you do your laundry? Do you change the nappies on your children?” She made her point.
Feature photo: Micere Mugo (left) with Linda Carty, professor in the African/African-American Studies Department  at Syracuse University. Alejandro Garcia photo.

Earth Day 2015 Sanity

CLIMATE CHANGES EARTH DAY PERSPECTIVE
by Ed Griffin-Nolan - Wednesday, April 22nd, 2015
What do we do to try to diminish our impact on global climate change?
Global warming should have a YouTube account. It should threaten beheadings, claim religious justification for its actions, and recruit a handful of our young ones to its cause. Then maybe we would start to fear it as much as we should.
Well, it worked for ISIS. The latest Middle Eastern terrorist boogey men, now in retreat across Iraq, certainly caught our attention. ISIS has managed to make us willing to expend all manner of national treasure, prestige and energy in the battle to exterminate them. Climate change that threatens our way of life? Not so much.
HomeUnderwaterWhile our behavior inexorably melts the glaciers, swamps our shorelines and multiplies the number of crazy weather events each year, it is the relatively remote but prominently publicized terrorist threat that has been the driving force for so many of our national policies. The terrorists have been able to harness the awesome power of fear, while the environmentalists cling tenaciously to a belief in the power of reason.
No contest.
If ISIS is Fox News, climate change is CNN. Or C-SPAN. Climate change moves too slowly, the science is too complicated, and there are too many parties too heavily invested in the status quo. It doesn’t help that the face most commonly associated with the cause is Al Gore, who seems too easy a target for mockery.
Even when climate change occasionally rears its head in a nasty way, as was the case with Hurricane Sandy, deniers were quick to dispute the links between our impact on the climate and its revenge upon us.
Think about it: There are no ISIS deniers, are there? In history’s rearview mirror, we will long have forgotten ISIS and Al Qaida, when we are trying to mop up from our failure to know which threats we should truly fear. But we hear no debate about whether ISIS is a threat.
What do we do to try to diminish our impact on global climate change? We shout up the stairs for the kids to turn out the lights, which is the modern equivalent of telling kids to clean their plates because children are starving in Africa. We recycle. We insulate.
One weekend a year we strap on rubber gloves and stalk the shoulders of our highways filling plastic bags with crap that passing drivers have carelessly thrown out their windows. Spring cleanups are great for building community, but they only remedy the actions of bad neighbors, not the mega damage we’ve done to our planet’s atmosphere.
Our newbie in Congress, John Katko, has made a high priority of fighting the terrorist threat. He is on a task force Congress created to keep us safe from the threat of homegrown fighters. All well and good. On his website, Katko has a list of 12 issues. Climate change is not one of them.
President Obama, in his 2015 State of the Union address, finally decided to level with us, calling climate change (not terrorism) “the greatest threat to future generations.” Note that Obama’s epiphany came after his party’s last electoral contest on his watch.
Climate change is a real threat. But we don’t get warned about it, don’t get asked to stay up all night and fret about it. No one gets frisked on their way out of Walmart to determine the carbon footprint of their purchases.
There’s no percentage in it for a politician, because the problem is us. No politician wants to face telling us the truth about our consumption and our propensity for waste. If you take an issue like a tax on carbon, even a revenue-neutral version that would distribute the proceeds to the people, there isn’t even a discussion.
The operative response from the vast majority of Republicans is to reject environmental concerns as job killers and denounce regulation as assaults on freedom. We need to remind them how tough it will be to find work and celebrate freedom when our coastline is submerged.